Current:Home > StocksWisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal -Excel Money Vision
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
View
Date:2025-04-25 13:40:14
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (7282)
Related
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- China says Philippines has 'provoked trouble' in South China Sea with US backing
- Turning dusty attic treasures into cash can yield millions for some and disappointment for others
- What Americans think about Hegseth, Gabbard and key Trump Cabinet picks AP
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Video shows drone spotted in New Jersey sky as FBI says it is investigating
- US weekly jobless claims unexpectedly rise
- GM to retreat from robotaxis and stop funding its Cruise autonomous vehicle unit
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Chiquis comes from Latin pop royalty. How the regional Mexican star found her own crown
Ranking
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Taylor Swift makes history as most decorated artist at Billboard Music Awards
- Supreme Court allows investors’ class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
- New Jersey, home to many oil and gas producers, eyes fees to fight climate change
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Trump will be honored as Time’s Person of the Year and ring the New York Stock Exchange bell
- New Jersey, home to many oil and gas producers, eyes fees to fight climate change
- What was 2024's best movie? From 'The Substance' to 'Conclave,' our top 10
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
When is the 'Survivor' Season 47 finale? Here's who's left; how to watch and stream part one
Luigi Mangione merchandise raises controversy, claims of glorifying violence
Gen Z is 'doom spending' its way through the holidays. What does that mean?
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
ParkMobile $32.8 million settlement: How to join class
When does 'No Good Deed' come out? How to watch Ray Romano, Lisa Kudrow's new dark comedy
The Voice Season 26 Crowns a New Winner