Current:Home > InvestFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -Excel Money Vision
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
PredictIQ View
Date:2025-04-08 03:43:09
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (51)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Reveal Old Navy’s Mystery Deals & Save 60% – Score $18 Jeans, $4 Tank Tops, $10 Leggings & More
- 2 ex-officers did not testify at their trial in Tyre Nichols’ death. 1 still could
- Angelina Jolie Drops Legal Case Over 2016 Brad Pitt Plane Incident
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Accused Los Angeles bus hijacker charged with murder, kidnapping
- Jeep urges 194,000 plug-in hybrid SUV owners to stop charging and park outdoors due to fire risk
- A crash with a patrol car kills 2 men in an SUV and critically injures 2 officers near Detroit
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Why break should be 'opportunity week' for Jim Harbaugh's Chargers to improve passing game
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- 5 dead, including minor, after plane crashes near Wright Brothers memorial in North Carolina
- Rebel Wilson and Ramona Agruma Make Debut as Married Couple During Paris Fashion Week
- Inside Frances Bean Cobain's Unique Private World With Riley Hawk
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Gavin Creel, Tony Award-Winning Actor, Dead at 48 After Battle With Rare Cancer
- Best Early Prime Day Home Deals: Prices as Low as $5.98 on Milk Frothers, Meat Thermometers & More
- Colorado family sues after man dies from infection in jail in his 'blood and vomit'
Recommendation
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Cardi B Details Getting Another Round of Her Butt Injections Removed
How bad is Tesla's full self driving feature, actually? Third-party testing bodes ill
Cutting food waste would lower emissions, but so far only one state has done it
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Martin Short Details Nervous First Day on Only Murders Set with Meryl Streep
Murders, mayhem and officer’s gunfire lead to charges at Brooklyn jail where ‘Diddy’ is held
Man charged with attempting to assassinate Trump will appear in court