Current:Home > NewsRomanian court rejects influencer Andrew Tate’s request to return assets seized in trafficking case -Excel Money Vision
Romanian court rejects influencer Andrew Tate’s request to return assets seized in trafficking case
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-10 22:52:29
BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — A court in Romania on Monday rejected a request by influencer Andrew Tate to return assets that were seized during investigations into the case in which he is charged with human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.
The Bucharest Tribunal’s decision can be appealed within 48 hours. Tate’s lawyer, Eugen Vidineac, told The Associated Press he has applied to appeal.
The decision comes nearly a year after Tate, his brother Tristan and two Romanian women were arrested near Bucharest. Romanian prosecutors formally indicted all four in June. They have denied the allegations.
After their arrest, Romanian authorities seized 15 luxury cars, 14 designer watches and cash in several currencies. The vehicles included a Rolls-Royce, a Ferrari, a Porsche, a BMW, an Aston Martin and a Mercedes-Benz. Authorities said the assets were worth an estimated 3.6 million euros ($3.9 million).
Romania’s anti-organized crime agency said at the time that the assets could be used to cover the expenses of the investigation and compensation for victims if authorities could prove they were gained through illicit activities.
Last week, the court ruled to ease geographical restrictions against the Tates, allowing them to travel freely around Romania with the court’s prior approval instead of being restricted to areas of Bucharest Municipality and nearby Ilfov County. That decision, which rejected an appeal by prosecutors, was final.
A trial date hasn’t been confirmed. The case is still being discussed in the preliminary chamber stages, a process in which the defendants can challenge prosecutors’ evidence and case file.
Andrew Tate, who has amassed 8.4 million followers on the social media platform X, has repeatedly claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media platforms for expressing misogynistic views and for hate speech.
veryGood! (145)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- In the Midst of the Coronavirus, California Weighs Diesel Regulations
- Jamil was struggling after his daughter had a stroke. Then a doctor pulled up a chair
- Arnold Schwarzenegger’s New Role as Netflix Boss Revealed
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $360 Tote Bag for Just $76
- Don’t Miss This $65 Deal on $142 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Skincare Products
- As states start to get opioid settlement cash, few are sharing how they spend it
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Jessica Alba Shares Sweet Selfie With Husband Cash Warren on Their 15th Anniversary
Ranking
- Average rate on 30
- Transcript: Former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster on Face the Nation, June 18, 2023
- How an abortion pill ruling could threaten the FDA's regulatory authority
- These Amazon Travel Essentials Will Help You Stick To Your Daily Routine on Vacation
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- More than half of Americans have dealt with gun violence in their personal lives
- Building a better brain through music, dance and poetry
- Blinken says military communication with China still a work in progress after Xi meeting
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Gerard Piqué Gets Cozy With Girlfriend Clara Chia Marti After Shakira Breakup
20 Fascinating Facts About Reba McEntire
Fear of pregnancy: One teen's story in post-Roe America
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
The big squeeze: ACA health insurance has lots of customers, small networks
How Massachusetts v. EPA Forced the U.S. Government to Take On Climate Change
Court Rejects Pipeline Rubber-Stamp, Orders Climate Impact Review