Current:Home > MarketsJudge forges ahead with pretrial motions in Georgia election interference case -Excel Money Vision
Judge forges ahead with pretrial motions in Georgia election interference case
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:10:38
ATLANTA (AP) — The charges against former President Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case seek to criminalize political speech and advocacy conduct that the First Amendment protects, his lawyers argued in a court filing challenging the indictment.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee plans to hear arguments on that filing and on two pretrial motions filed by former Georgia Republican Party chair David Shafer during a hearing set for Thursday. Lawyers for Shafer argue that he acted legally when he and other state Republicans signed a certificate asserting that Trump won the 2020 presidential election in Georgia and declaring themselves the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors.
McAfee is forging ahead with the case even as Trump and other defendants have said they plan to seek a ruling from the Georgia Court of Appeals to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis. The judge earlier this month rejected defense efforts to remove Willis and her office over her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but he did give the defendants permission to seek a review of his decision from the appeals court.
Willis in August obtained an indictment against Trump and 18 others, accusing them of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to try to illegally overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, which the Republican incumbent narrowly lost to Democrat Joe Biden. All of the defendants were charged with violating Georgia’s expansive anti-racketeering law, along with other alleged crimes.
Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others have pleaded not guilty. No trial date has been set, though Willis has asked that it begin in August.
Trump’s lawyers wrote in their filing that the crimes their client is charged with fall into five separate areas: Republican elector certificates submitted by Georgia Republicans; a request to the Georgia House speaker to call a special legislative session; a filing in a lawsuit challenging the 2020 presidential election; a January 2021 phone call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger; and a letter sent to Raffensperger in September 2021.
“The First Amendment, in affording the broadest protection to political speech and discussion regarding governmental affairs, not only embraces but encourages exactly the kind of behavior under attack in this Indictment,” Trump’s lawyers wrote.
Prosecutors argued in response that the indictment “is based on criminal acts, not speech.” Wherever speech is involved, they wrote, it is “speech integral to criminal conduct, fraud, perjury, threats, criminal solicitation, or lies that threaten to deceive and harm the government.”
Most of the charges against Shafer have to do with his involvement in helping to organize a group of Georgia Republicans to cast Electoral College votes for Trump even though the state’s election had been certified in favor of Biden. The charges against him include impersonating a public officer, forgery, false statements and writings, and attempting to file false documents.
His lawyers wrote in a filing that prosecutors are seeking “to punish as criminal conduct by Mr. Shafer which was lawful at the time.” They argued that Shafer “was attempting to comply with the advice of legal counsel” and the requirements of the Electoral Count Act.
Shafer’s lawyers also ask that three phrases be struck from the indictment: “duly elected and qualified presidential electors,” “false Electoral College votes” and “lawful electoral votes.” They argue that those phrases are used to assert that the Democratic slate of electors was valid and the Republican slate of electors in which Shafer participated was not. They argue that those are “prejudicial legal conclusions” about issues that should be decided by the judge or by the jury at trial.
Prosecutors argue that Shafer is using “incorrect, extrinsic facts and legal conclusions ... to somehow suggest that he was or may have been a lawful presidential elector at the time of the charged conduct.” They agreed that the indictment includes “disputed” and “unproven” allegations but said “that is not and never has been grounds for the dismissal of an indictment.”
Willis and her team experienced several setbacks in March. Although McAfee did not grant defense requests to remove her from the case, he was sharply critical of her actions and said Wade, her hand-picked lead prosecutor on the case, must step aside for Willis to continue the prosecution. Just days earlier, the judge dismissed six of the 41 counts in the indictment, including three against Trump, finding that prosecutors failed to provide enough detail about the alleged crimes.
veryGood! (69549)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- What in the world does 'match my freak' mean? More than you think.
- Trump's conviction in New York extends losing streak with jurors to 0-42 in recent cases
- 'Happy National Donut Day, y'all': Jelly Roll toasts Dunkin' in new video
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Lady Gaga addresses pregnancy rumors with cheeky TikTok: 'Register to vote'
- Sam Heughan Jokes Taylor Swift Will Shake Off Travis Kelce After Seeing Him During Eras Tour Stop
- An Iowa man is accused of killing 3 people with a metal pipe
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Secret Service head says RNC security plans not final as protesters allege free speech restrictions
Ranking
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Biden border action prompts concern among migrant advocates: People are going to have fewer options to access protection
- Horoscopes Today, June 5, 2024
- A court ruling will allow new student housing at University of California, Berkeley’s People’s Park.
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Southern Baptists are poised to ban churches with women pastors. Some are urging them to reconsider
- Secret Service head says RNC security plans not final as protesters allege free speech restrictions
- Biden border action prompts concern among migrant advocates: People are going to have fewer options to access protection
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
The costs of World War II and the war in Ukraine fuse as Allies remember D-Day without Russia
Trump Media wants probe into stock manipulation, blames ‘naked’ short sellers for losses
Will Smith, Martin Lawrence look back on 30 years of 'Bad Boys': 'It's a magical cocktail'
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Black Music Month has evolved since the 1970s. Here’s what you need to know
Chanel artistic director Virginie Viard to depart label without naming successor
AI ‘gold rush’ for chatbot training data could run out of human-written text