Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Excel Money Vision
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-14 06:22:53
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Nordstrom Clear the Rack Last Day to Shop: Jaw-Dropping Deals Including $3 Swimsuits
- You'll Buzz Over Samuel L. Jackson's Gift to Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds for Their 2008 Wedding
- Princess Estelle and Prince Oscar of Sweden Look So Grown Up at Royal Family Event
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Why Matt Damon Negotiated Extensively With Wife Luciana in Couples Therapy Over Oppenheimer Role
- Bachelor Nation's Raven Gates and Adam Gottschalk Welcome Baby No. 2
- Kendall Jenner Is Not Well After Serving Up Drinks With Mom Kris Jenner in Hilariously Boozy Video
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Mandy Moore Says She's Received Paychecks Under $1 for This Is Us Streaming Residuals
Ranking
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- More than 80 million Americans remain under heat alerts
- Miranda Lambert Says She Raised a Little Hell After Concert Selfie Incident
- Beyoncé's New Perfume Will Have You Feeling Crazy in Love
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Ariana Grande Dating Wicked Co-Star Ethan Slater After Dalton Gomez Breakup
- Kate Gosselin Says Son Collin Has “Multiple Psychiatric Diagnoses” in Response to Estrangement Allegation
- Margot Robbie Faked Her Own Death as a Kid to Get Revenge on Her Babysitter
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Investigation launched after video shows police K-9 mauling suspect with his hands up
Why Julie Bowen Is Praising Single Modern Family Co-Star Sofia Vergara After Joe Manganiello Split
Israel approves divisive judicial overhaul, weakening court's power amid protests
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
We Solemnly Swear You'll Want to See Daniel Radcliffe's Transformation Over the Years
Scorching temperatures to persist in the West for another week
Funding Poised to Dry Up for Water Projects in Ohio and Other States if Proposed Budget Cuts Become Law